Student journalists who cover Montgomery County Public Schools are asking district officials to respect their right to chronicle their campus communities as they see fit.

In an open letter to district leadership, high school reporters decried a memo that instructed administrators to review the final drafts of student publications.

This move, the student reporters warn, gives principals power over stories about their own actions, establishes no appeal process and undermines student journalism.

“When our reporting is suppressed, the unbiased truth does not get told,”reads the letter, signed by students across the district.

Advertise with us

High school publications published the letter Friday on their websites, alongside recaps of volleyball games and news about cellphone restrictions.

District officials did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

At issue is guidance circulated by MCPS this spring.

“While student editors and student publication advisors engage in the initial rounds of editing, a school administrator must review the final draft of any printed items (publications, clothing etc.) prior to printing or publication,” it reads.

Content can’t contain or promote “bullying, harassment, or ridicule of individuals or groups,” the guidance reads. Officials are told to watch for “sarcasm or teasing that could be interpreted as bullying.”

Advertise with us

The student reporters say that this is vague and risks creating an “inconsistent patchwork of enforcement, where student journalists’ rights depend on which principal happens to review their work.”

“A student using his opinion column to harass and spread unfounded gossip about the class president is very different from a student writing a sharp critique of a speech given by a Board of Education member — yet both could be considered ‘ridicule of individuals or groups,’” the letter reads.

Maryland law protects the freedom of the press in school-sponsored media. District leadership cannot censor articles before they are published, except under specific circumstances, such as if the material is libelous, an unwarranted invasion of privacy or in violation laws.

Free-speech organizations are amplifying the concerns of MCPS student journalists.

“This new policy is egregious. With administrators editing stories, these critically-important student newspapers are nothing more than public relations tools for MCPS,” James Libresco, a board member of the Student Press Law Center, said in a statement.

“History has shown that when administrators review articles, they will inevitably edit to paint themselves and their bosses in a better light.”